Verdier v. Roach
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
The Court.
—When this cause was pending in Department One, the following opinion was prepared by Commissioner Vanclief. After full consideration in Bank, we are satisfied with that opinion and with the conclusion therein reached; and for the reasons therein given, the judgment is affirmed.
“ Vancliee, C.
— On the twelfth day of November, 1881, Thomas H. Blythe leased to the plaintiffs the first story, or ground-floor, of a building in San Francisco, to ■ be occupied as a store for the term of nine years and *468ten months. The lease contained a covenant on the part of the lessor to indemnify the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In re Estate of SwainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- Kenyon v. . SeeNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
- Ellis v. PolhemusCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
- Stuttmeister v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Pico v. De La GuerraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Newman v. BurwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Clary v. ClaryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Hurlimann v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Barto v. StewartWashington Supreme Court · 1899
- Takahashi v. Pepper Tank & Contracting Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1942
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.