Booth v. Pendola
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Santa Barbara County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
The Court.
This is an action brought by plaintiffs having several liens of mechanics and material-men against property owned by Péndola, deceased, in his lifetime.
The findings show that Péndola entered into a written agreement with one Hamilton on March 29, 1887, for *40the construction of the Western Hotel, in the city of Santa Barbara, and on the 15th of June entered into another contract with said Hamilton to build a cottage near said hotel and on the same lot. Neither of these contracts was recorded. Belt & Co. furnished materials for both buildings, for which Hamilton agreed to pay a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Fallon v. ButlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
- In re Estate of SwainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- Myers v. ReinsteinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- In re McCAUSLANDCalifornia Supreme Court · 1878
- Stuttmeister v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Wadleigh v. PhelpsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Nolte v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Hendricks v. HendricksNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1950
- Projects Unlimited, Inc. v. Copper State Thrift & Loan Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1990
- Poulson v. StanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.