Legal Opinion
Landgraf v. Ellsworth
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided February 21, 1964No. 38,949PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Knutson, Chief Justice.
This is an appeal from an order denying plaintiff’s motion for a new trial.
The litigation arises out of a dispute concerning commissions which plaintiff claims to have earned while employed by defendant.
Up to April 1956, Nash Finch Company owned and operated St. Cloud Restaurant Supply Company, which was engaged in selling and installing restaurant fixtures and equipment. Plaintiff was an employee of Nash Finch Company. The only written evidence of the terms of employment consists of a letter written by Nash Finch Company to plaintiff on January 23, 1954, which reads as…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Dairy Queen, Inc. v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Stein v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Minneapolis & St. Louis Railroad v. BombolisSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Breimhorst v. BeckmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
- Funk v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Uselman v. UselmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Abraham v. County of HennepinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- State Ex Rel. Humphrey v. Alpine Air Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
- Tyroll v. Private Label Chemicals, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
- Olson v. Synergistic Technologies Business Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.