Legal Opinion
Abraham v. County of Hennepin
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided February 7, 2002No. CX-00-835, C7-00-1652PublishedCited by 56 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ANDERSON, RUSSELL A., Justice.
In separate but consolidated actions appellants David Abraham and Scott Len-nander brought claims seeking only money damages against their former employer, respondent Hennepin County, for retaliatory discharge in violation of the Whistle-blower Act, Minn.Stat. § 181.932, subd. 1(a) (2000), and the Minnesota Occupational Safety and Health Act (MOSHA), Minn. Stat. § 182.654, subd. 9 (2000). 1
The district court initially granted the county’s motion for summary judgment, dismissing all claims, and appellants appealed dismissal of the whistleblower and MOSHA…
2Cases cited82 opinions
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Granfinanciera, S.A. v. NordbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Curtis v. LoetherSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Tull v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Kelsay v. Motorola, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1978
77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- Nelson v. Productive Alternatives, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- Kratzer v. Welsh Companies, LLCSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
- Dukowitz v. Hannon Security ServicesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
- United Prairie Bank-Mountain Lake v. Haugen Nutrition & Equipment, LLCSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- Gee v. Minnesota State Colleges & UniversitiesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.