Legal Opinion
State v. Boyle
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 1, 2008No. SC 17966PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ROGERS, C. J.
In this certified appeal, the state claims that the Appellate Court improperly reversed the judgment of the trial court, which modified the conditions of the defendant’s probation to include sex offender evaluation and treatment as deemed necessary by the office of adult probation. The state claims that the Appellate Court improperly concluded that sex offender evaluation and treatment is not reasonably related to the rehabilitation of the defendant, Kevin M. Boyle, under General Statutes § 53a-30 (a) (17). State v. Boyle, 102 Conn. App. 507, 518-19, 925 A.2d 1172 (2007).…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- U.S. Bancorp Mortgage Co. v. Bonner Mall PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- State v. NardiniSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Loisel v. RoweSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- State v. ValinSupreme Court of Iowa · 2006
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- In Re Melody L.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- State v. BarclayIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
- Harley v. Indian Spring Land Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- Patterson v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- State v. BradleyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.