Legal Opinion
State v. Smith
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided April 19, 1988No. 13116PublishedCited by 119 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtArthur H. Healey, J.
The defendant, Kendall Smith, a probationer, has appealed from the imposition by the trial court, Barall, J., of a special condition of probation one year after his sentencing originally placing him on probation. He maintains that, in doing so, the trial court violated General Statutes § 53a-301 and his probationer’s right to be free from illegal searches and seizures. We dismiss his appeal as moot.
*154On October 30,1985, Smith pleaded guilty under the Alford,' doctrine to one count of robbery in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-134 (a) (2).2 North Carolina v. Alford, 400…
2Cases cited102 opinions
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
97 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by119 opinions
- State v. KellySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- State v. FaganSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- United States v. Brandon Michael LifshitzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- People v. RodriguezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. DavisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
114 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.