Legal Opinion
U.S. Bancorp Mortgage Co. v. Bonner Mall Partnership
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided November 8, 1994No. 93-714PublishedCited by 1,116 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scalia
The question in this case is whether appellate courts in the federal system should vacate civil judgments of subordinate courts in cases that are settled after appeal is filed or certio-rari sought.
I
In 1984 and 1985, Northtown Investments built the Bonner Mall in Bonner County, Idaho, with financing from a bank in that State. In 1986, respondent Bonner Mall Partnership (Bonner) acquired the mall, while petitioner U. S. Bancorp Mortgage Co. (Bancorp) acquired the loan and mortgage from the Idaho bank. In 1990, Bonner defaulted on its real estate taxes and Bancorp scheduled a foreclosure sale.
Th…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Sanders v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Mistretta v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. Munsingwear, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1,116 opinions
- Arizonans for Official English v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Campbell-Ewald Co. v. GomezSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Camreta v. GreeneSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Sossamon v. Lone Star State of TexasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
- Marshall v. Housing Authority of San AntonioTexas Supreme Court · 2006
1,111 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.