Legal Opinion
Pegastaff v. Public Utilities Commission
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 29, 2015No. A139732PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
STEWART, J.
PegaStaff is an agency that provides temporary staffing for its clients. A large part of PegaStaff’s business was the provision of staffing to Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E), through a staffing agency with which PG&E directly contracted, initially Corestaff Services, LP (Corestaff), and later Agile 1.
California’s Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) adopted “General Order 156” to implement Public Utilities Code1 sections 8281 through 8286 (Article 5),2 the purpose of which is to encourage and develop the use of women, minority and disabled veteran-owned business…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Rescue Army v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Smiley v. CitibankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Lockyer v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- J. Jack Bras, Individually and Doing Business as J. Jack Bras & Associates v. California Public Utilities CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Cumero v. Public Employment Relations BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Pegastaff v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 2015
- Public Utilities Commission v. Superior Court of San Francisco CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Cal. Public Utilities Com. v. Super. Ct.California Court of Appeal · 2016
- Larson v. Heck CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2016
- Rittiman v. P.U.C.California Court of Appeal · 2022
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.