Legal Opinion
Pegastaff v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 28, 2015No. A142736PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
STEWART, J.
PegaStaff is an agency that provides temporary staffing for its clients. A large part of PegaStaff’s business was the provision of staffing to Pacific Gas & Electric Company (PG&E), through a staffing agency with which PG&E directly contracted, initially Corestaff Services, LP (Corestaff), and later Agile 1.
The California Public Utilities Commission (PUC or commission) adopted general order 156 (GO 156) to implement Public Utilities Code 1 sections 8281 through 8286 (Article 5), 2 the purpose of which is to encourage and develop the use of women-, minority-, and disabled…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- San Diego Gas & Electric Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- Consumers Lobby Against Monopolies v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- People Ex Rel. Harris v. Pac Anchor Transportation, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2014
- Hartwell Corporation v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- People Ex Rel. Orloff v. Pacific BellCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Goncharov v. Uber Techs., Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- City of S.F. v. Uber Techs., Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Public Utilities Commission v. Superior Court of San Francisco CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Cal. Public Utilities Com. v. Super. Ct.California Court of Appeal · 2016
- City and County of S.F. v. Uber TechnologiesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.