Legal Opinion
Rittiman v. P.U.C.
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 17, 2022No. A162842Published
1Opinion of the Court
Filed 6/17/22 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE BRANDON RITTIMAN et al., Petitioners, A162842 v. PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION, (Public Utilities Commission Nos. Respondent. 20597, 20598, 20599 & 20600) This original mandamus proceeding brought under the Public Records Act (PRA) (Gov. Code, §§ 6251 et seq.) presents three questions: (1) Was petitioner1 required to fully exhaust the administrative remedies set forth in the Public Utilities Code and in California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) General Order 66-D…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Environmental Protection Agency v. MinkSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Central Intelligence Agency v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- People v. Western Air Lines, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1954
- People v. MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.