Smiley v. Citibank
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MOSK, Acting C. J.
We granted review in this cause—which is one of numerous similar matters brought in federal and state courts throughout the *142nation—in order to consider the meaning and effect of section 30 of the National Bank Act of 1864. In pertinent part and without substantive change, the provision has been incorporated in section 5197 of the Revised Statutes of 1878, and has been codified in section 85 of title 12 of the United States Code (hereafter section 85), which is its common designation. As relevant here, it provides that a national banking association, or, more simply, a…
2Cases cited68 opinions
- M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- New York State Conference of Blue Cross & Blue Shield Plans v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- English v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Gade v. National Solid Wastes Management Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by95 opinions
- Smiley v. Citibank (South Dakota), N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- City of Stockton v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- Stop Youth Addiction, Inc. v. Lucky Stores, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1998
- Gerawan Farming, Inc. v. LyonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- County of Amador v. El Dorado County Water AgencyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.