Legal Opinion

Graves v. Flesher

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 9, 1934No. 24610. Department OnePublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

— This action was brought to recover damages for personal injuries, and also property damage. The defendants were Herman Helwig and wife and W. W. Flesher and wife. The cause was tried to the court without a jury, and resulted in findings of fact from which it was concluded that the plaintiff was entitled to recover against all of the defendants. Flesher and wife moved for a new trial, and also for a judgment in their favor, both of which motions were overruled. Judgment was entered against all of the defendants in the sum of twenty-five hundred dollars, from which Flesher and wife appeal.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hellan v. Supply Laundry Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Lindsey v. ElkinsWashington Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Martin v. Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1931
  4. McAllister v. AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Rust v. SchlaitzerWashington Supreme Court · 1933

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Thornton v. EnerothWashington Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Alden v. WatsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1940
  3. Hemrich v. KochWashington Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Osinski v. BensonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1944
  5. Devlin v. Spokane United RailwaysWashington Supreme Court · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API