McAllister v. Anderson
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtTolman, C. J.
This is an action for damages growing out of an automobile collision. A trial to a jury was had, resulting in a verdict in plaintiffs’ favor in the sum of a thousand dollars. After the rendition of the verdict, the court granted a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict which was followed by a judgment dismissing the action; and the plaintiffs have appealed therefrom.
In granting the motion for judgment n. o. v., the trial court held that the appellants were guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law, and that ruling is the sole question now presented for review.
It appears…
2Cited by15 opinions
- Hauswirth v. Pom-ArleauWashington Supreme Court · 1941
- Moen v. ChestnutWashington Supreme Court · 1941
- Hefner v. PatteeWashington Supreme Court · 1939
- Graham v. RoderickWashington Supreme Court · 1949
- Huber v. Hemrich Brewing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1936
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.