Legal Opinion

McAllister v. Anderson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 20, 1932No. 23610. Department TwoPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTolman, C. J.

This is an action for damages growing out of an automobile collision. A trial to a jury was had, resulting in a verdict in plaintiffs’ favor in the sum of a thousand dollars. After the rendition of the verdict, the court granted a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict which was followed by a judgment dismissing the action; and the plaintiffs have appealed therefrom.

In granting the motion for judgment n. o. v., the trial court held that the appellants were guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law, and that ruling is the sole question now presented for review.

It appears…

2Cited by15 opinions

  1. Hauswirth v. Pom-ArleauWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Moen v. ChestnutWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Hefner v. PatteeWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Graham v. RoderickWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Huber v. Hemrich Brewing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1936

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API