Legal Opinion

Lindsey v. Elkins

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 1929No. 21846. Department TwoPublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMillard, J.

This is an action to recover for personal injuries sustained in a collision of three automobiles. From the judgment rendered on the verdict in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendants J. E. Elkins and Irving T. Sidel, the defendant Elkins alone appeals.

J. E. Elkins died subsequent to his appeal, and his widow, executrix of her deceased husband’s estate, has been substituted as appellant herein.

Three automobiles were involved in the collision, which occurred on the Bothell highway north of Seattle on July 4, 1928, at one-thirty a. m. The night was dark, with rain and mist obscuring…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Lauson v. Town of Fond du LacWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Morehouse v. City of EverettWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  3. State v. ParkerWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. HilligossIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Hellan v. Supply Laundry Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1917

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Kastanis v. Educational Employees Credit UnionWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Nelson v. PlacanicaWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Caylor v. B. C. Motor Transportation, Ltd.Washington Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Cooper v. Pay-N-Save Drugs, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Thornton v. EnerothWashington Supreme Court · 1934

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API