Legal Opinion

American Pacific Roofing Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided July 31, 1990No. 1-89 CPublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RADER, Judge.

In this case arising under the Contract Disputes Act (CDA or the Act), 41 U.S.C. § 609(a)(1) (1988), plaintiff, American Pacific Roofing, Co., seeks a price adjustment to a construction contract performed for the Department of the Navy (the Navy). Plaintiff also alleges that the Navy wrongfully withheld payments. Defendant has counterclaimed for reprocurement costs and water damage.

Defendant moved for partial summary judgment. Defendant contends that this court lacks jurisdiction under the CDA because plaintiff did not properly submit its claim to the contracting officer…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  2. Paragon Energy Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
  3. J.M.T. MacHine Company, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
  4. Paragon Energy Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
  5. West Coast General Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Dawco Construction, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
  2. Neal & Company, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
  3. United States v. Victoria L. RayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  4. United Partition Systems, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
  5. Hamza v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1994

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API