Legal Opinion
United Partition Systems, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided January 28, 2004No. 03-1242CPublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*631 OPINION AND ORDER
LETTOW, Judge.
This contract ease is before the Court on defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) of the Rules of the Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”). The case has a convoluted procedural history, and the government’s motion requires that this history be set against the complexity of the Contract Disputes Act’s claim requirements, which are jurisdictional in this Court.1
Plaintiff, United Partition Systems, Inc. (“United Partition”) seeks payment under a contract pursuant to which United Partition was to provide the…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Mathews v. DiazSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Griffin v. School Bd. of Prince Edward Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Northstar Financial Advisors Inc. v. Schwab InvestmentsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Tennessee Valley Authority v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Record Steel & Construction, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- Bearingpoint, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- United Partition Systems, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.