Legal Opinion
Neal & Company, Inc. v. The United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided September 23, 1991No. 90-5108PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PLAGER, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff-appellee Neal & Company, Inc. (Neal) entered into a fixed-price contract with defendant-appellant the United States (Government) to construct two fuel storage tanks at the United States Navy base at Adak, Alaska (Adak). The Government provided the specification for the manufacture of panels used in constructing the tanks. Some of the panels bowed during construction resulting in unanticipated costs to Neal. Additionally, Neal claimed that the contract required the Government to ship certain construction materials but that the Government did not, causing Neal to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Fortec Constructors v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Dawco Construction, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Stuyvesant Dredging Company v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- J. L. Simmons Company, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969
- American Pacific Roofing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Grumman Data Systems Corporation v. Sheila Widnall, Secretary of the Air Force, and Contel Federal Systems, Inc., IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Tecom, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Sterling Millwrights, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1992
- George Sollitt Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- D.L. Braughler Company, Inc. v. Togo D. West, Secretary of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.