Paragon Energy Corp. v. United States

Plaintiff, Paragon Energy Corporation (Paragon), petitions for a contract adjustment and monetary compensation for its unilateral bid mistake based upon clerical error. The *885underlying facts were previously set out in full in a well-reasoned opinion by Judge Kunzig1 in which this court, in ruling on defendant’s motion to dismiss, held that we had jurisdiction to entertain Paragon’s direct action under the Contract Disputes Act of 1978.2 We now have the merits of plaintiffs claim before us on defendant’s motion for summary judgment and plaintiffs cross-motion for summary judgment, and we grant…