Legal Opinion
West Coast General Corp. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided December 18, 1989No. 354-88CPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MARGOLIS, Judge.
The plaintiff in this direct access action is a contractor who seeks an equitable adjustment under the Contract Disputes Act of 1978 (CDA or Act), 41 U.S.C. § 601 et seq., in the amount of $209,952. Plaintiff alleges that the defendant United States required it to perform work which was not required by the contract. Defendant has moved to dismiss on the ground that this court lacks jurisdiction because plaintiff failed to submit a proper claim to the contracting officer as required by the CDA. After considering the entire record and after oral argument, this court finds…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Contract Cleaning Maintenance, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Paragon Energy Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
- Tecom, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Z.A.N. Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984
- Hoffman Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1985
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Dawco Construction, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- West Coast General Corporation v. John H. Dalton, Secretary of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Neal & Company, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- American Pacific Roofing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990
- K-Con Building Systems, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.