Legal Opinion

State v. Kendall

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 25, 2001No. C9709-37346; CA A100683PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*489DEITS, C. J.

Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for possession of a controlled substance. ORS 475.992. He assigns error to the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress. The trial court based its denial of the motion on its conclusion that defendant abandoned any protectable privacy or posses-sory interest in his property. The state cross-assigns error to the trial court’s decision, arguing that an alternative basis for denying the motion to suppress was that the evidence in question was discovered pursuant to a valid inventory. We reverse and remand.

We state the facts as found by…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ball v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  2. State v. AtkinsonOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  3. State v. BooneOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State v. KnoxCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  5. State v. RoundsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. GallowayCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  2. State v. GuerreroCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  3. Weber v. Oakridge School District 76Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  4. State v. BernaboCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  5. Commonwealth v. CarnesMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2012

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API