Legal Opinion

State v. Bernabo

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 10, 2008No. 04FE1672MS; A131625PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.

Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction, based on a conditional plea of guilty, for possession of a Schedule II controlled substance, former ORS 475.992(4) (2003), renumbered as ORS 475.840(3) (2005). Defendant assigns error to the trial court’s denial of her motion to suppress evidence obtained during an inventory of the contents of her car during a traffic stop and from a sunglasses case discovered on the ground at the stop. We conclude that the trial court did not err in denying the motion to suppress the evidence from the sunglasses case but did err in denying the motion to suppress…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Ball v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  2. State v. HallOregon Supreme Court · 2005
  3. State v. AtkinsonOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State v. BeaOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  5. State v. MortonOregon Supreme Court · 1998

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. FulmerOregon Supreme Court · 2020
  2. State v. BarnthouseCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  3. State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  4. State v. StoneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  5. State v. LaneyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API