Legal Opinion

State v. Knox

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 26, 1999No. CM93-0464; CA A79581PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*670DE MUNIZ, J.

The Supreme Court remanded this appeal to us “in light of State v. Morton, 326 Or 466, 953 P2d 374 (1998).” State v. Knox, 327 Or 97, 957 P2d 1209 (1998). In our earlier opinion, we had held that the trial court erred in denying defendant’s motion to suppress evidence of his unlawful possession of fireworks. However, we concluded that the court’s denial of defendant’s motion to suppress evidence of his possession of controlled substances was not error, because defendant had disclaimed any interest in the drugs. State v. Knox, 134 Or App 154, 894 P2d 1185 (1995). We adhere to the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. TannerOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  2. State v. RodriguezOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State v. KostaOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  4. State v. MortonOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  5. State v. KnoxCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State v. GallowayCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  2. State v. KauffmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  3. State v. KendallCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  4. State v. BernaboCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  5. State v. McKeeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API