Legal Opinion

State v. Boone

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 2, 1998No. CC 93-2156-CR; CA A84673; SC S42791PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Hoomissen, J.

The principal issue in this criminal case is whether a city ordinance that authorizes police to impound a car also authorizes them to conduct an inventory search of the car’s contents. The Court of Appeals held that the city ordinance did not constitute an authorization from an extra-executive, politically accountable body to conduct an inventory search. State v. Boone, 136 Or App 614, 901 P2d 990 (1995) (citing State v. Cook, 136 Or App 525, 901 P2d 911 (1995), which so held with respect to a similar inventory search). We allowed review and reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals.

This…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. OwensOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  2. State v. StevensOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. AtkinsonOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State v. CookCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State v. HallOregon Supreme Court · 2005
  2. State v. BarnumOregon Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State v. ConnallyOregon Supreme Court · 2005
  4. State v. FulmerOregon Supreme Court · 2020
  5. Smith v. Washington CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API