Milwaukee Mechanics' Ins. Co. v. Sewell
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from Superior Court, Custer County ; J. W. Lawter, Judge. Action by R. N. Sewell against the Milwaukee Mechanics’ Insurance Company and .others, to recover on fire insurance policies, J. C. Pyle, interpleader, asking judgment against plaintiff. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
BjRUNiSON, 'C.
This action was for the recovery of a loss upon eight fire insurance policies issued upon a hotel and the furniture and fixtures therein contained; the amount of the insurance being $8,500. The policies contained an arbitration clause. A fire occurred on the 1st day of January, A. D. 1913, totally destroying the property covered by said policies, the companies acting by and through the Bates Adjustment Company of Oklahoma. City, and the insured were not able to agree on the amount of the loss, and an instrument entitled “¡Submission to Appraisements,” was executed by…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Carroll v. Girard Fire Insurance of the City of PhiladelphiaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- McCollough v. Home Ins. Co. of N.Y.California Supreme Court · 1909
- The Caledonian Fire Ins. Co. v. TraubCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1897
- Caledonian Insurance v. CookeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1897
- J. M. Winchester v. North British & Mercantile InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Security Benefit Ass'n v. LloydSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Resolute Ins. Co. v. Percy Jones, IncCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1952
- Simmons v. HowardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- REGIONAL AIR, INC. v. Canal Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.