Legal Opinion

Security Benefit Ass'n v. Lloyd

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 15, 1924No. 12431PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

ESTES, C.

Hattie Lloyd and Frank Lloyd, defendants in error, as plaintiffs, sued the Security Benefit Association, successors to the National Council of the Knights & Ladies of Security, plaintiff in error, as defendant in the district court oi logan countv. Parties will be referred t>> as they appeared in the district court. Plaintiffs were the father and mother of Clarence R. Lloyd. Defendant was a fraternal benefitf sooiety maintaining a local lodge or council at Guthrie. In February, ,1918. ¡taid Clarence became a member of said society and of the local council under the usual…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Eisminger v. BemanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  2. Alva Roller Mills v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  3. Burgess v. CrumpSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  4. New v. ElliottSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  5. Elsea Bros. v. KillianSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Wayne Tank & Pump Co. v. HarperSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  2. McGrath v. DurhamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  3. Holcombe & Hoke Mfg. Co. v. WatersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  4. Whitehead v. CookSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  5. Perry v. MyersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API