McCollough v. Home Ins. Co. of N.Y.
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.
On July 31, 1905, the defendant issued to plaintiff a policy of fire insurance in the sum of three thousand dollars. Of this amount two thousand dollars was on a frame building, and one thousand on household furniture and effects contained therein. The building and contents were destroyed by fire, and this action was brought on the policy. The plaintiff had judgment for $2650, with interest and costs, and defendant appeals from the judgment and from an order denying its motion for a new trial. The appellant bases its position upon two clauses of the policy, one relating to the title of the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Wheaton v. North British and Merchantile InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Arnold v. American Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1906
- Imperial F. Ins. v. DunhamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888
- Phenix Ins. v. KerrCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1904
- Loventhal v. Home InsuranceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Bollinger v. National Fire InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Corporation of the Royal Exchange Assurance v. FranklinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
- Beauchamp v. Retail Merchants Ass'nNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1917
- Anderson v. YaworskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
- Sharman v. Continental InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.