Legal Opinion

J. M. Winchester v. North British & Mercantile Insurance

California Supreme Court

Decided May 25, 1911No. L.A. No. 2753PublishedCited by 13 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. George E. Church, Judge presiding. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment rendered in favor of plaintiff in a suit upon a contract of insurance for loss by fire.

The property alleged to have been destroyed consisted of certain walnuts which, at the time of the fire, were stored in a room of a dwelling-house in the city of Los Angeles. The suit was for seven hundred dollars, the full amount of the policy. Judgment was rendered as prayed.

The court found that before the fire the nuts were of the value of $958.50; that the total value of the nuts not entirely destroyed by fire was not in excess of one hundred and fifty-five dollars; and…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. Liverpool, London & Globe InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Carroll v. Girard Fire Insurance of the City of PhiladelphiaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Old Saucelito Land & Dry Dock Co. v. Commercial Union Assurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Lesure Lumber Co. v. Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
  5. Nurney v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1886

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Waymire v. California Trona Co.California Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Great American Co-Operative Fire Ass'n v. JenkinsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912
  3. Goldberg v. Provident Washington InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
  4. Gunderson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  5. Jordan v. FriedmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API