Rose v. Arizona Department of Corrections
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
McGREGOR, Judge.
Appellant Joseph G. Rose (Rose) appeals from the trial court’s judgment dismissing his action against appellee Arizona Department of Corrections (ADOC) for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. The issue presented is whether the Administrative Review Act (ARA), A.R.S. §§ 12-901 through -914, provides judicial review of ADOC decisions involving inmate disciplinary hearings. We hold that it does not.
I
Rose is an inmate confined to ADOC’s custody. On April 17, 1989, Rose submitted to a random urinalysis test. ADOC claimed that he tested positive for…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- City of Mesa v. KillingsworthArizona Supreme Court · 1964
- Large v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1986
- Clardy v. LeviCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- Dawson v. Hearing CommitteeWashington Supreme Court · 1979
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Al-Shabazz v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
- Grosvenor Holdings, L.C. v. FigueroaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
- Brandon v. Department of CorrectionsAlaska Supreme Court · 1993
- L'Heureux v. State Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1998
- Cook v. RyanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2020
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.