Legal Opinion
Clardy v. Levi
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 24, 1976No. Nos. 75-3069, 76-1259PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SNEED, Circuit Judge:
Appellants Harry Clardy and Phillip L. Tucker appeal to this court to set aside the disciplinary measures which officials of the Bureau of Prisons at McNeil Island Federal Penitentiary imposed on them pursuant to administrative convictions of assault on another inmate.1 They based their appeal, primarily, on their belief that the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. § 551 et seq. (1970) (APA), provides them with procedural rights which they were not afforded. Appellant Tucker also asserts that prison officials denied him procedural due process by refusing his request…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Baxter v. PalmigianoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Wong Yang Sung v. McGrathSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Nazareth Gates, and United States of America, Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellee v. John Collier, Superintendent, Mississippi State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Marcello v. BondsSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Louis Wolfish v. Honorable Edward LeviCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- Simmat v. United States Bureau of PrisonsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- United States Ex Rel. Wolfish v. LeviDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1977
- ANSELMOBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1989
- FLORIDA DEPT., OF OFFENDER REHAB. v. JerryDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.