Legal Opinion
Brandon v. Department of Corrections
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided December 17, 1993No. S-5140PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COMPTON, Justice.
Richard Brandon was found guilty of violating prison regulations at a Cook Inlet Pretrial Facility (CIPT) disciplinary hearing. Brandon claims his right to due process of law was violated in the disciplinary hearing process. The superior court “denied” Brandon’s appeal. This appeal followed. We reverse.
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
On December 27, 1990, Correctional Officers Smith and Adler were directed by their supervisor, Sergeant Rodgers, to search Richard Brandon’s room. The room was a double occupancy room at CIPT shared by Brandon and Jomar Bungay. As a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Doe v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
- McGinnis v. StevensAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
- Sandra J. Douglas, for Herself and as Representative of a Class v. Beneficial Finance Co. Of AnchorageCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
- Hayes v. CharneyAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Kodiak Seafood Processors Ass'n v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
- Myers v. Alaska Psychiatric InstituteAlaska Supreme Court · 2006
- James v. State, Department of CorrectionsAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. MurtaghAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
- Tulkisarmute Native Community Council v. HeinzeAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.