Legal Opinion
Rockford Township v. City of Rockford
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided April 11, 2000No. C0-99-1775PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LANSING, Judge.
Rockford Township brought a declaratory judgment action against the City of Rockford, seeking a declaration that the city had improperly annexed 80 township acres. The district court dismissed the action for failure to apply for judicial review within the 30-day appeal period of Minn.Stat. § 414.07 (1998), and the township appealed. Because we agree that section 414.07 governs the time to seek judicial review of annexations by ordinance, we affirm.
FACTS
In early 1999, the City of Rockford agreed to help Minnesota Diversified Products, Inc., (MDPI) identify available…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- King v. St. Vincent's HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Boutin v. LaFleurSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- Meister v. Western National Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- Chanhassen Estates Residents Ass'n v. City of ChanhassenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Wynkoop v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. KollaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
- Danna Rochelle Back v. State of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016
- Founders Insurance Company v. James YatesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016
- Attorney's Fees of Mohr v. PowersHawaii Supreme Court · 2001
- Attorney's Fees of Mohr v. PowersHawaii Supreme Court · 2001
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.