Legal Opinion
Meister v. Western National Mutual Insurance
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided January 17, 1992No. C1-90-1997PublishedCited by 83 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
YETKA, Justice.
This case comes before us on stipulated facts and involves whether the 1985 anti-stacking amendment to the Minnesota No-Fault Automobile Insurance Act1 forecloses the requirement that Western National Mutual Insurance Company (hereinafter Western National), as insurer of plaintiff Meister, pay benefits in addition to the basic economic loss benefits paid by Mutual Service Casualty Insurance Company (hereinafter MSI), the insurer of Michael Meister’s employer. The District Court of Carlton County ruled in favor of Western National, the court of appeals reversed, and Western…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Hibbing Education Ass'n v. Public Employment Relations BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- A. J. Chromy Construction Co. v. Commercial Mechanical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Holman v. All Nation Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Wasche v. Milbank Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- National City Bank of Minneapolis v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by83 opinions
- Watson v. United Services Automobile Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- Larson v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
- Jenoff, Inc. v. New Hampshire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- State v. LeathersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.