Legal Opinion
State v. Kolla
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided December 2, 2003No. A03-55PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HALBROOKS, Judge.
Appellant challenges his conviction of six counts of violating Minnesota state game and fish laws relating to the transport of minnows, arguing that (1) he successfully asserted the affirmative defense created by MinmStat. § 97A.255, subd. 2(a) (2000), and (2) the minnow-transport laws under which he was charged, MinmStat. §§ 97C.501, subd. 4(a)-(b), .515 (2000), discriminate against interstate commerce in violation of the Commerce Clause. We conclude that the affirmative defense asserted by appellant was not available to him. We further conclude that MinmStat. §§…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Maryland v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- City of Philadelphia v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Oregon Waste Systems, Inc. v. Department of Environmental Quality of Ore.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Hughes v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. ReynuaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011
- STUDOR, INC. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
- State v. BankenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
- In Re Commission Investigation of Issues Governed by Minnesota Statutes, Section 216a.036Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
- State v. BarsnessCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011