Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Attorney's Fees of Mohr v. Powers

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided September 11, 2001No. 21564Published

1Concurrence

Concurring Opinion by

RAMIL, J.

I agree with the majority’s holding in Part II.A. that an ICA order denying in part or in full attorneys’ fees and costs under HRS § 802-5(b) is appealable under HRS § 602-59 as a collateral order. See majority, at 4, 32 P.3d at 650. I also agree that the ICA abused its discretion in granting Mohr only 2.2 of the 21.3 hours requested for research. See majority at 8, 32 P.3d at 654. I write separately, however, to express my concern about the inadequate hourly rate paid to court-appointed private counsel under HRS § 802-5. In my view, the current rate—far below…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Brogan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. Trustees of the Office of Hawaiian Affairs v. YamasakiHawaii Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Raymond Miranda v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
  4. United States v. Terrance BaileyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
  5. Rogers v. Miles Laboratories, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1991

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API