Legal Opinion

Attorney's Fees of Mohr v. Powers

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided September 11, 2001No. 21564Published

1Opinion of the Court

32 P.3d 647 (2001)

97 Hawai`i 1

In re Attorney's Fees of Reinhard MOHR, Court-Appointed Counsel-Appellant in State of Hawai`i, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

Paul Powers, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 21564.

Supreme Court of Hawai`i.

September 11, 2001.

Richard Mohr, court-appointed counsel, on the writ.

Opinion of the Court by MOON, C.J.

On December 6, 1999, Reinhard Mohr petitioned this court for a writ of certiorari to review the Intermediate Court of Appeals' (ICA) order, filed November 23, 1999, summarily approving in part and denying in part Mohr's request for attorney's fees, pursuant to Hawai`i Revised…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Forrester v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. United States v. ButlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  5. Gentile v. State Bar of Nev.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API