State v. Muhle
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
SANDSTROM, Justice.
[¶ 1] Shannon Muhle appeals from the district court judgment entered after a jury convicted her of gross sexual imposition and abuse or neglect of a child. Concluding that the children’s pre-trial statements were properly admitted, that the prosecutor did not violate discovery rules, and that the evidence supports the verdict, we affirm.
I
[¶ 2] Shannon and Andrew Muhle are married and have three minor children, S.M., K.E., and G.E. On August 31, 2005, Tammy Anderson of Cass County Social Services interviewed all three Muhle children because of G.E.’s alleged sexual contact…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Idaho v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- State v. BlueNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. HidanovicNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. PaulNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. ThomasNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
- State v. MuhleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. PoulorNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.