State v. Blue
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
KAPSNER, Justice.
[¶ 1] James Blue appealed from a criminal judgment requesting review of an order granting the State’s motion to use a videotaped discussion between a four-year-old and a forensic interviewer. After viewing the videotape testimony, a jury found him guilty of gross sexual imposition. Because the videotape was a testimonial statement and the child was available to testify, the playing of the videotape without the opportunity to cross-examine the witness violated Blue’s constitutional right to confront his accuser in violation of the Sixth Amendment. We therefore reverse and…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Delaware v. FenstererSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by67 opinions
- People v. CageCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. ArnoldOhio Supreme Court · 2010
- Franklin v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2007
- State v. KirbySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- State v. ArroyoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.