Legal Opinion

State v. Blue

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 2006No. 20050187PublishedCited by 67 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAPSNER, Justice.

[¶ 1] James Blue appealed from a criminal judgment requesting review of an order granting the State’s motion to use a videotaped discussion between a four-year-old and a forensic interviewer. After viewing the videotape testimony, a jury found him guilty of gross sexual imposition. Because the videotape was a testimonial statement and the child was available to testify, the playing of the videotape without the opportunity to cross-examine the witness violated Blue’s constitutional right to confront his accuser in violation of the Sixth Amendment. We therefore reverse and…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  4. California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Delaware v. FenstererSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by67 opinions

  1. People v. CageCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  2. State v. ArnoldOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Franklin v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2007
  4. State v. KirbySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
  5. State v. ArroyoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API