Legal Opinion

State v. Paul

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 9, 2009No. 20080292PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARING, Justice.

[¶ 1] Wilson Grant Paul, Sr., appeals from a criminal judgment entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of class AA felony gross sexual imposition. We conclude the district court did not commit reversible error in its evidentiary rulings and the evidence is sufficient to sustain the verdict. We affirm.

I

[¶ 2] In July 2007, Paul, his girlfriend, and their three children lived in a small apartment in Fargo. Paul’s girlfriend’s son from a previous relationship and a nephew also lived in the apartment. The apartment was located on the second floor of a house that had been…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. State v. GunbySupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
  2. County of Stutsman v. State Historical Society of North DakotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Harp v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2008
  4. State v. CasadySupreme Court of Iowa · 1992
  5. State v. BlueNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. State v. AabrekkeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  2. State v. GrantNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State v. BehrendtHawaii Supreme Court · 2010
  4. State v. BuckleyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  5. State v. ShawNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API