Legal Opinion

Idaho v. Wright

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 27, 1990No. 89-260PublishedCited by 1,781 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Connor

This case requires us to decide whether the admission at trial of certain hearsay statements made by a child declarant to an examining pediatrician violates a defendant’s rights under the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment.

1 — Í

Respondent Laura Lee Wright was jointly charged with Robert L. Giles of two counts of lewd conduct with a minor under 16, in violation of Idaho Code § 18-1508 (1987). The alleged victims were respondent’s two daughters, one of whom was 5!4 and the other 214 years old at the time the crimes were charged.

*809Respondent and her ex-husband, Louis Wright, the father of…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1,781 opinions

  1. Devereaux v. AbbeyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  2. White v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Lilly v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. Michigan v. BryantSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  5. State v. MadrigalOhio Supreme Court · 2000

1,776 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API