State v. Poulor
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
McEvers, Justice.
[¶1] Kanakai Poulor appeals from a criminal judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of gross sexual imposition. We conclude the State did not violate the Confrontation Clause when it presented a video recorded forensic interview with *536 the 8-year old minor complainant; the court did not abuse its discretion in admitting the complainant's out-of-court statements about sexual abuse into evidence; and sufficient evidence supports the conviction for gross sexual imposition. We affirm.
I
[¶2] On May 11, 2017, Poulor, a family friend of the complainant, had come to the family's…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- State v. BlueNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. KrullNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- Vann v. VannNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. HirschkornNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. SmithNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2023
- State v. HirschkornNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
- State v. YousifNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
- Interest of K.V.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
- Interest of K.V.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.