Legal Opinion

State v. Poulor

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 22, 2019No. 20190017PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McEvers, Justice.

[¶1] Kanakai Poulor appeals from a criminal judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of gross sexual imposition. We conclude the State did not violate the Confrontation Clause when it presented a video recorded forensic interview with *536 the 8-year old minor complainant; the court did not abuse its discretion in admitting the complainant's out-of-court statements about sexual abuse into evidence; and sufficient evidence supports the conviction for gross sexual imposition. We affirm.

I

[¶2] On May 11, 2017, Poulor, a family friend of the complainant, had come to the family's…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. State v. BlueNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State v. KrullNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Vann v. VannNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  5. State v. HirschkornNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. SmithNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2023
  2. State v. HirschkornNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  3. State v. YousifNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
  4. Interest of K.V.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  5. Interest of K.V.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2019

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API