State v. Muhle
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.
[¶ 1] Andrew Brice Muhle appeals from the criminal judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of two counts of gross sexual imposition and one count of abuse or neglect of a child. We affirm, concluding that the district court did not abuse its discretion in admitting the children’s out-of-court statements and did not violate Muhle’s constitutional right to confront his accusers, that the State’s failure to disclose a witness’s pre-trial statement did not violate Muhle’s right to a fair trial, that prosecutorial misconduct did not warrant reversal of the…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Strickler v. GreeneSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- State v. OlanderNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. AddaiNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. WannerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. ClarkNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
- Broadwell v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. GrantNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.