Legal Opinion

State v. Muhle

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 22, 2007No. 20060328PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1] Andrew Brice Muhle appeals from the criminal judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of two counts of gross sexual imposition and one count of abuse or neglect of a child. We affirm, concluding that the district court did not abuse its discretion in admitting the children’s out-of-court statements and did not violate Muhle’s constitutional right to confront his accusers, that the State’s failure to disclose a witness’s pre-trial statement did not violate Muhle’s right to a fair trial, that prosecutorial misconduct did not warrant reversal of the…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Strickler v. GreeneSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. State v. OlanderNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. AddaiNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  2. State v. WannerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  3. State v. ClarkNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Broadwell v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  5. State v. GrantNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API