Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Krause v. Jones

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided July 3, 1928PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosenberry, J.

The relator is a farmer living near Genoa City, Wisconsin, and owns a herd of pure-blood Holstein-Friesian cattle. These cattle were registered in the Holstein-Friesian Registry Association, Inc., of Harrisburg, Pennsylvania. Nine head of registered cattle belonging to the plaintiff were killed pursuant to the terms of the Live Stock Sanitation Act (ch. 94, Stats.). The cattle were alleged to be reasonably worth $1,845.

Sub. (1) of sec. 94.16, Stats., provides:

“For each animal condemned and slaughtered the owner shall receive in addition to the net salvage upon the certificate of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Roberts v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. United States ex rel. Dunlap v. Black, Commissioner of PensionsSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  3. American Casualty Insurance & Security Co. v. FylerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1891
  4. Dufton v. DanielsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Harwood v. QuinbySupreme Court of Iowa · 1876

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Cartwright v. SharpeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Patrick v. RileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Menzl v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Milwaukee County v. SchmidtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Walter Laev, Inc. v. KarnsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API