Walter Laev, Inc. v. Karns
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHanley, J.
The issues on this appeal are: (1) Is mandamus an available remedy to review the action of the administrator in refusing to issue a certificate of title; and (2) on denial of the motion to quash the alternative writ, should the court have allowed a return to be filed?
Availability of Mandamus.
The appellant contends that under secs. 342.06 (1) (e), 342.11 (3), 342.17 (1), and 342.18 (2), Stats., an applicant for a certificate of title, after an involuntary transfer, must present the following information:(1) The old certificate of title, if available;(2) a fee of $1;(3) an application on the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Roberts v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Town of Burke v. City of MadisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
- Menzl v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- State ex rel. Board of Education v. HunterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
- Brown v. Farmers Mutual Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Kurkierewicz v. CannonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
- Law Enforcement Standards Board v. Village of Lyndon StationWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
- State Ex Rel. Althouse v. City of MadisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- Milwaukee County v. SchmidtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
- State Ex Rel. North v. GoetzCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1983
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.