Legal Opinion

Walter Laev, Inc. v. Karns

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 1968No. 1PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHanley, J.

The issues on this appeal are: (1) Is mandamus an available remedy to review the action of the administrator in refusing to issue a certificate of title; and (2) on denial of the motion to quash the alternative writ, should the court have allowed a return to be filed?

Availability of Mandamus.

The appellant contends that under secs. 342.06 (1) (e), 342.11 (3), 342.17 (1), and 342.18 (2), Stats., an applicant for a certificate of title, after an involuntary transfer, must present the following information:(1) The old certificate of title, if available;(2) a fee of $1;(3) an application on the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Roberts v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. Town of Burke v. City of MadisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Menzl v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  4. State ex rel. Board of Education v. HunterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Brown v. Farmers Mutual Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Kurkierewicz v. CannonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Law Enforcement Standards Board v. Village of Lyndon StationWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
  3. State Ex Rel. Althouse v. City of MadisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Milwaukee County v. SchmidtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
  5. State Ex Rel. North v. GoetzCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API