Roberts v. United States
Supreme Court of the United States
CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. • The case is stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Peckham
A writ of certiorari was issued in this case to the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia, for the purpose of reviewing a judgment of that court affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court of the District, which awarded to the relator, Marie A. Valentine, a writ of mandamus to compel the petitioner, who is the Treasurer of the United States, to pay her, as assignee, a residue of 2.35 per cent interest upon certain certificates issued by the board of audit of the District of Columbia pursuant to the provisions of section 6 of the act approved June 20, 1874, entitled “An act for the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- United States ex rel. Dunlap v. Black, Commissioner of PensionsSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
3Cited by122 opinions
- Wilbur v. United States Ex Rel. KadrieSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Work v. United States Ex Rel. RivesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Rowan County v. SloasKentucky Supreme Court · 2006
- Louisiana v. McAdooSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Deering Milliken, Inc., a Corporation v. Reed Johnston, as Regional Director of the National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1961
117 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.