Menzl v. City of Milwaukee
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHeffernan, J.
The city contends that the cost of the contract chargeable to city funds is less than $1,000, and, hence, by its terms, the bid ordinance, sec. 7.29, is not mandatorily applicable.
If the contract in question is not subject to the provisions of the bid section, the city is not bound by that type of procedure and even, after determining to invite bids, may reject any or all bids and ask for new bids, or may contract on the basis of reasonable business judgment with one who is not the low bidder. Cullen v. Rock County (1943), 244 Wis. 237, 240, 12 N. W. (2d) 38, 10 McQuillin, Mun. Corp. (3d…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Ricketson v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
- State Ex Rel. Martin v. ZimmermanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
- State ex rel. Phelan v. Board of EducationWisconsin Supreme Court · 1869
- Mueller v. Eau Claire CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
- Wisconsin Pharmaceutical Asso. v. LeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Kurkierewicz v. CannonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
- Cartwright v. SharpeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
- Aqua-Tech, Inc. v. Como Lake Protection & Rehabilitation DistrictWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
- Morrissette v. DeZoniaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
- Waste Management, Inc. Ex Rel. Waste Management, Inc. Boeing v. Wisconsin Solid Waste Recycling AuthorityWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.