Legal Opinion

People v. Torp

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 18, 1940No. Crim. 1732PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPullen, P. J.

Defendant was indicted and subsequently convicted of grand theft, and from the judgment of conviction and order denying a new trial this appeal is prosecuted.

In the first count of the indictment it is alleged:

“ . . . Casper N. Torp was entrusted by Dorothy St. Louis Austin and W. G. Austin, her husband, with the sum of Four Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($4500.00) . . . for the express purpose of paying the said sum of Four Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($4500.00) ... to Emilie H. Game; that the said Casper N. Torp did not pay said sum ... or any part thereof, to the said Emilie H. Game, but…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. TreadwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  2. People v. RiccardiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  3. People v. GavinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  4. People v. KirwinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  5. People v. SteffnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. ScofieldCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
  2. People v. CorenevskyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  3. People v. ApplegateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  4. State v. HillUtah Supreme Court · 1941
  5. People v. CoeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API