Legal Opinion
People v. Torp
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 18, 1940No. Crim. 1732PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPullen, P. J.
Defendant was indicted and subsequently convicted of grand theft, and from the judgment of conviction and order denying a new trial this appeal is prosecuted.
In the first count of the indictment it is alleged:
“ . . . Casper N. Torp was entrusted by Dorothy St. Louis Austin and W. G. Austin, her husband, with the sum of Four Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($4500.00) . . . for the express purpose of paying the said sum of Four Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($4500.00) ... to Emilie H. Game; that the said Casper N. Torp did not pay said sum ... or any part thereof, to the said Emilie H. Game, but…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. TreadwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- People v. RiccardiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- People v. GavinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- People v. KirwinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- People v. SteffnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. ScofieldCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
- People v. CorenevskyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- People v. ApplegateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- State v. HillUtah Supreme Court · 1941
- People v. CoeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.