Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Steffner

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 29, 1924No. Crim. No. 720PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GLENN, J., pro tem.

Defendant was convicted of the crime of embezzlement. A motion for a new trial was duly made and denied. No appeal was taken from this order, the appeal being from the judgment only.

Respondent contends that, as no appeal was taken from the order denying motion for new trial, this court is without power to review the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict. The same point was made, and decided adversely to this contention, in the case of People v. Steffner, Cr im. No. 723, ante, p. 1 [227 Pac. 690], in which an opinion has this day been filed. We refer to that…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Keys v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  2. People v. TreadwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  3. People v. EmersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  4. People v. GordonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  5. People v. Van EwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. People v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  2. People v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  3. In Re BermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  4. Weingarten v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1962
  5. People v. TorpCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API