Legal Opinion
People v. Applegate
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 7, 1949No. Crim. 718PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, J.
Defendant was charged with grand theft in the language of the statute (Pen. Code, §§ 484, 951 and 952), that on September 15, 1947, he took “the personal property of the United Flower Growers’ Association, a corporation, consisting of” $9,800, to which he entered a plea of not guilty. A jury returned a verdict of guilty. Defendant appealed.
It is conceded by defendant that “embezzlement,” as that offense was previously known, may be charged and proved under this form of information. (People v. Dunn, 40 Cal.App.2d 6 [104 P.2d 119].) It is rightfully argued that the change in the offense was one…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- People v. NewlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- United States v. L. Cohen Grocery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
- In Re BlaneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- People v. GallagherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- People v. PierceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- People v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- People v. BarryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- People v. MartinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- People v. DugasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.