Legal Opinion

People v. Treadwell

California Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1886No. 20140PublishedCited by 45 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Yolo County, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcKee, J.

—The defendant in this action was convicted of embezzlement. He appeals from the judgment and an order denying his motion for a new trial.

The motion for a new trial was made upon the grounds that the verdict was against the evidence and contrary to law; and that the court, against the objections and exceptions of the defendant, erred in matters of law at the trial and in its instructions toc the jury.

As laid in the information, the charge is, that on the 12th of December, 1883, the defendant was “ agent and servant” of Charles Han eke; and in that capacity received from his principal, in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. SpragueCalifornia Supreme Court · 1879
  2. Ex parte HedleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
  3. People v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
  4. People v. SotoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
  5. People v. HicksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1879

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. People v. ChessmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. American Savings Life Insurance v. RiplingerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
  3. People v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  4. People v. FlynnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Agar v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1911

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API