State v. Hill
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
McDonough, justice.
Frank R. Hill was convicted in the district court of the crime of obtaining property by false pretense, from which judgment of conviction he has appealed. The alleged errors relied on for reversal are directed, first, to the complaint and information charging the offense, second, to the bill of particulars and amendments thereto which the court directed the state to file in connection with the information, third, to certain evidence which was introduced, and fourth to the verdict of guilt returned.
As to the complaint and information, it is contended that the same are…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- State v. RoyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1936
- People v. BogdanoffNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- People v. FarsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
- State v. CapaciSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1934
- State v. SchnelleWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1884
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. CrankUtah Supreme Court · 1943
- State v. StraughanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1956
- State v. BarlowUtah Supreme Court · 1944
- State v. AndersonUtah Supreme Court · 1941
- State v. BurkeUtah Supreme Court · 1942
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.